Section 1: Report
Şeyma, a former worker at a well-known food factory, was dismissed from her job after joining a union and participating in union activities. She was one of five women workers who were fired and participated in a two-month protest in front of the factory. Despite facing various pressures and obstacles, Şeyma remained committed to the protest until the very end. However, after the protest, she started to struggle financially and had difficulty finding new employment due to her union involvement. She faced discrimination and exclusion from job opportunities, being labeled as a “problematic worker” by multiple employers. Despite these challenges, she continued to search for new job opportunities. She worked at cafes and informal businesses that did not provide insurance and paid less than minimum wage. Even when she found employment at a gas station, she experienced gender-based discrimination and harassment from intoxicated drivers. Despite the difficulties she faced, Şeyma remained determined to improve her working conditions and continued to seek new job opportunities.
Section 2: ESG Risks
1. Discrimination and Retaliation: The content highlights the risk of discrimination and retaliation faced by workers who join unions or engage in union activities. This poses a significant ESG risk for companies, as it can lead to reputational damage and legal implications under the German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act.
2. Gender-Based Violence and Harassment: The experiences shared by Şeyma highlight the risk of gender-based violence and harassment in the workplace. This risk is relevant to businesses under the German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act, as it emphasizes the importance of preventing and addressing such issues.
3. Economic Inequality and Exploitation: Şeyma’s struggle to find stable employment and her experience with low wages and poor working conditions highlight the risk of economic inequality and exploitation within supply chains. This risk is relevant to investors concerned with ESG performance, as it reflects the need for fair and ethical labor practices.
Section 3: Vulnerable Groups
1. Women Workers: Şeyma’s story highlights the vulnerability of women workers in the face of discrimination, harassment, and unfair treatment. Women workers are particularly affected by gender-based violence and inequality in the workplace.
Section 4: Organizations
1. Food Factory: The food factory where Şeyma used to work is implicated in the identified ESG risks. The factory is responsible for the discrimination, retaliation, and poor working conditions experienced by Şeyma and other workers.
2. Gas Station: The gas station where Şeyma found employment also played a role in perpetuating gender-based discrimination and harassment. The gas station failed to provide a safe and inclusive working environment for its employees.
Section 5: Regions
The content does not explicitly mention specific localities, cities, or countries that are directly related to the identified ESG risks.
Section 6: Sectors
1. Food Manufacturing Sector: The food factory where Şeyma worked falls within the food manufacturing sector. This sector is impacted by the identified ESG risks, including discrimination, harassment, and poor working conditions.
2. Service Sector: The gas station where Şeyma found employment falls within the service sector. This sector is also impacted by gender-based discrimination and harassment.
Section 7: Keywords
ESG Risks, Discrimination, Retaliation, Gender-Based Violence, Harassment, Economic Inequality, Exploitation, Women Workers, Food Factory, Gas Station, Food Manufacturing Sector, Service Sector.
SOURCE